Chapter 116
 
 
由賓拉登談到兩岸之戰

 

  Osama Bin Laden 造成的恐怖行動,在美英等世界各國的掃蕩之下,支持恐怖行動的國家,成為全世界反恐怖者的眼中釘。如果Osama Bin Laden不是躲在阿富汗,而是藏身中國大陸,中國大陸就是國際反恐怖的戰場,中共大概會劃定特別戰區,供美英等國來反恐怖,最有可能就是把Osama Bin Laden趕到新疆或是西藏來共同打擊內部獨立分離組織。

  如果台灣資金被吸光,而台資公司有太多員工加入共產黨組織,或是台灣有許多學中醫或是學“?”的到中共地區讀書,中共會一下子有許許多多的台灣兵,可以打倒台灣分離主義的政權,中共做事一定有計劃與統戰的策略,台灣人投共就會一步步成為台灣解放軍。

  WTO的規則只會對外國人有效,台灣雖然已經是一國,但是在中共佔有國際政治舞台的今天,台灣本土化民主制度能否與中共政權抗衡,端視台灣人(芋頭、蕃薯、原住民)是否會團結與主權認同、國家認同,可是最荒唐的是到現在有些台灣人還認為中國是真正的祖國,而台灣只不過客居之處,一些住台灣、吃台灣、拿台灣納稅人的錢,享福數拾年了,這些人的良心何在?中共會善待這些人嗎?中華民國的招牌早已經被中共拿去了,好不容易台灣人有今日的自由民主生態,難道不值得珍惜嗎?

  台灣人與中共交往,千萬要注意到中共的統戰計謀,台灣人把經濟與政治劃分清楚,配合政府的政策就是了,當然在中共地區,做生意亦只好保持戒慎恐懼了!

  在台灣有一股力量正在興起,就是反美協防台灣哈共黨與親中西瓜大班,這批人亦得到台灣大中國主義的支持,有許多台灣本土人士也參予其列,五十年國民黨在台灣的中國人文教育非常成功,而海洋之國世界村台灣的理念並未落實,台灣人享有民主自由的制度,亦不知民主自由人權為何物,而立法院與統派媒體效應正代替教育部教導台灣人所謂“無政府的自我膨脹”,就是“言論自由、行動自由”,充份殺伐台灣人民對民主化本土化的幼苗,其等對奪回台灣政權架構,虛擬中華民國,成就一中原則的企圖昭然若揭。

  台灣人是什麼東西?台灣人有存在的必要嗎?有責任捍衛台灣的民主與自由嗎?還必須付出如此多的經濟、政治、人格的代價來保護自民國39年來已經滅亡的中華民國嗎?這�堛�上一張政治漫畫,就點出台灣未來的隱憂。這�媞疆�宋先生的人物與統派反美人士配合,拿槍桿子向美國台灣軍事聯合(坦克車)投擲炸彈,圖中的標題為:“在台灣總是有人要做中共政權希望做的事”,此反應宋先生反對台灣的將領赴美國參加軍事研習的省思。

 

  立法委員邱垂貞於Dec.19,2001就質疑台灣企業在大陸的公司有參加中國共產黨的情形,是否未來中共會運用台灣企業成為中共統戰組織,進一步赤化台灣,而佔領台灣,消滅台灣。(參考英文稿)

 

 

Communist Party sets up office in Taiwanese firm

INFILTRATION: In the first such case, the Chinese Communist Party has publicly set up a cell within a Taiwanese firm based in Shenzhen. Taiwanese officials are not amused

2001/12/20
CNA WITH STAFF WRITER


The Ministry of Economic Affairs "does not encourage" Taiwanese companies operating in China getting involved with the Chinese Communist Party, Minister of Eco-nomic Affairs Lin Hsin-yi (林信義) said yesterday.

Fielding questions at the Legislative Yuan, Lin said reports of the opening last Saturday of a Chinese Communist Party branch office in Shenzhen-based Foxconn, an offshoot of Taiwan's Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, "is an issue that should be faced squarely and dealt with."

Foxconn is the first Taiwanese-owned company to publicly set up a Chinese Communist Party cell, even though the party is believed to have secretly set up cells in many other Taiwanese-owned firms.

The Foxconn cell consists of 144 communist party members who are also the company's employees.

On Saturday, the cell elected a seven-member party committee and a five-member disciplinary committee. All of the 144 members are Chinese citizens.

Hon Hai's chairman Kuo Tai-ming (郭台銘) did not attend the founding ceremony, but instead sent a written message praising the party cadres.

Lin said that the economics ministry would stay in close contact with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) to gain a better understanding of alleged communist party "infiltration" of Taiwanese-financed business and industrial enterprises in China.

Lin made the remarks in response to a question from Chiu Chui-chen (邱垂貞), a DPP legislator. Chiu said that the Chinese Communist Party is aggressively recruiting China-based Taiwanese business people to organize party branch operations in an attempt to increase the effectiveness the party's "united front" overtures toward Taiwan.

Chiu asked Lin whether he knew how many Taiwanese companies had investments in China and what the government would do if all Taiwanese firms operating in China became "communized" and their staffs return to Taiwan to vote.

Lin said that US$19.4 billion had been invested in China by more than 20,000 companies, although Chinese authorities put the figure at around US$45 billion.

Lin admitted that, if true, communist party involvement in Tai-wanese firms in China "is not a good thing," but said that it is only happening on a small scale and was not seen as having a major impact on the companies' operations.

Meanwhile, the MAC said that it is investigating communist party operations at Foxconn and would determine whether they constitute a violation of Taiwanese law.

The director of the MAC's legal affairs department, Johnnason Liu (劉德勳), said that the Foxconn case was an exception, not part of a growing trend.

He called on China, however, to support Taiwanese corporate investment and to defend these companies' rights, rather than turn them into political pawns.