Chapter 136
 
 
想一想中共拼命把小孩送往歐美留學的時刻,
台灣人子女到大陸學什麼?

 

  台灣人太不用功,趁著中共的招商,不計代價到同語言同種族的大陸去投資,是因為英文能力不足,無法以世界觀來看待台灣政經世界化的走向,更離譜的是,有許多人把小孩送到大陸留學,而不往先進的民主國家就學,中共高幹的子女,則是反其道而行,拼命把子女送到歐美各國讀書,學的是最好的新科技與企管經營方式。

  台灣子女到大陸學中醫或進入大學與研究所,也許是為了方便與學費便宜,而事實上,在中國讀書的台灣小孩,要適應台灣的民主社會有其困難,如果以到中國讀書為跳板,然後進入歐美各國深造,大概勉為可行之道,若是學成無法在台灣發展或被認可,其等數萬名台灣大陸留學生,也會陷入另一種生活競爭。

  台灣的大學被世界各國認可,無所謂歧視的問題。台灣的學校上缺乏真正的民主思想與保護人權的教育,蔣氏皇朝遺下來的教育,亦有妖化台灣舊遺民的現象。

  故台灣的民主化過程,亦有如清末,國父孫中山先生以國外留學生為骨幹,回到中國來革命,以對抗清朝的奴化思想,經十次革命,死的是中國留學的精英,而一般被奴化習慣的百姓對孫中山的革命,渾然無知,台灣民主化過程,亦如同孫中山的革命,由海外留學生、學者為骨幹,與國內精英�媕野~合,方成氣候。而天佑台灣,蔣經國晚年有了覺悟,所提攜的李登輝,亦能小心謹慎,忍辱負重,終於使得台灣的民主運動不必血光相見。

  現在的台灣學院與大學,呈高度飽和現象,學費亦不比大陸貴,在一連貫教育改革之後,台灣的世界化會在WTO架構下,有逐漸宏觀的氣勢,試問,送小孩到大陸學什麼?未來台海大戰,這些小孩靠那邊?學中醫,台灣的市場飽和了;學西醫,中共地區並不先進;學管理,中共沒輒;學…

  呂副總統於出訪和前,接受訪問有些談話,值得參考;


 

Vice president discusses WTO, Cabinet

The major reason for our industries' exodus to China lies in the laziness of the people, who are afraid to face up to the challenge of using English."
-- Annette Lu, vice president

Vice President Annette Lu will lead a special delegation to visit two of Taiwan's allies, Nicaragua and Paraguay, by attending the inauguration ceremonies of their newly elected presidents. Before leaving Taiwan, Lu spoke with reporters Lin Chieh-yu and Lee Chi-Kuang about the goals of her trip, the selection of Taiwan's representative to WTO and an impending Cabinet reshuffle


2002/01/06  TAIPEI TIMES


Vice President Annette Lu says the country
needs to keep talent
in Taiwan.

PHOTO: FANG PIN-CHAO, TAIPEI TIMES

Question: What are the primary objectives of your delegation during its stopover in the US?

Annette Lu (呂秀蓮): The delegation will stay in New York for three days at the Waldorf Hotel. We are scheduled to meet with think tank members, US business leaders and overseas Taiwanese.

We will not attend any official meetings but I do plan to meet with some members of Congress. I will also visit the Metropolitan Museum and the "Ground Zero" area around the World Trade Center."

Many of Taiwan's top graduates and engineers have moved to China and Taiwan has also seen many of its key businesses invest in China. Because of these problems, I have arranged a meeting with aerospace and telecommunication industry financiers on Wall Street. We want to attract businesses from the international community.

We also intend to transform Taiwan into a global logistics center, but domestic capital alone is not enough. So we need to convince international entrepreneurs that Taiwan can serve as a springboard to the Chinese market.

On the return trip, the delegation will stay in Los Angles for two days and I will do the same thing [try to attract foreign investments] there.

In addition to foreign investment, I want to recruit talent for Taiwan. Taiwan is in great need of high-tech experience for developing the information technology and bio-tech industries.

Though these talents need to be actively cultivated at home, the process is too time-consuming to meet our immediate needs. Thus, we need to attract talent from abroad.

While we can recruit from China and other foreign countries, overseas Taiwanese have great potential and we intend to focus on them.

Q: Who do you think should be Taiwan's representative to the WTO?

Lu: Privately I have recommended two qualified people to the president for the post. But at the moment it is better not to disclose their names. I don't have any personal connections with these two; my recommendation is based purely on their merit.

They both have very good credentials. One was a former director of the Board of Foreign Trade as well as a seasoned diplomat. This person had been living in Europe for a long time and is very familiar with European affairs.

In particular, the person once served as our representative in Geneva.

In addition, I have also recommended a person who is very experienced at cross-strait negotiations. This person has played a very active role in cross-strait talks. Any problems that the WTO would pose to us would pale in comparison to the problems that China confronts us with.

Thus, someone who has more than 10 years of experience in cross-strait talks should be qualified to serve as the WTO representative.

I believe that President Chen is now giving very serious thought to the WTO representative issue. We should be patient.

Q: After Taiwan enters the WTO, what should Taiwanese do to enhance their competitiveness? What trends should the government come to grips with?

Lu: Taiwan has become an official participant in globalization with its entry into the WTO.

Our people should emphasize their skills in information technology and English. The major reason for our industries' exodus to China lies in the laziness of the people, who are afraid to face up to the challenge of using English.

It is easier for people to go to China where people speak the same language as people in Taiwan.

What's even more worrisome is the fact that more and more parents are sending their children to receive an education in China in order to protect them from the challenges of English or globalization in general.

If this trend goes on, the quality of our country's future talent could become a cause for concern.

If parents continue to find the easiest path for their children, Taiwan will only go backward. If Taiwan continues to lag behind, it will end up like Penghu -- economically marginalized.

I call on our people not to seek an easy life, but to send their children to study in the most advanced countries.

I also want to warn against a situation in which our culture and publication industries are compromised by Chinese capital.

This is happening more and more often. The government should take some precautions lest someday China should write Taiwan's textbooks for us. Wouldn't that be ridiculous?

Q: Have you made any suggestions to the president regarding the Cabinet reshuffle?

Lu: The president is responsible for this and I have not discussed it with him.

In my view, all the Cabinet members in the last year or so have been working very hard.

But the general public may have different opinions. So we might as well have some professional and objective opinion polls on the performance of each Cabinet member.

For example, lawmakers could be asked to give an evaluation of each Cabinet member.

Alternatively, questionnaires could be distributed among business and academic circles for their views about Cabinet members' performances.

I believe this would generate even more reliable results.