|
Executive Yuan passes oversight bill
POWERLESS? Even if the legislature passes the bill to set up a mechanism to monitor cross-strait accords, it would not affect the service trade pact, the MAC said
By Shih Hsiu-chuan / Staff reporter
A man has the Chinese characters for “Safeguard Taiwan” painted on his back in henna in front of the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi, left, is joined by Cabinet spokesperson Sun Lih-chyun, center, and Vice Minister of Economic Affairs Woody Duh as he explains the Cabinet’s proposal for a bill establishing a mechanism to monitor cross-strait agreements at the Executive Yuan in Taipei yesterday.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
The Executive Yuan yesterday approved a draft bill that would establish a mechanism to monitor agreements between Taiwan and China, but showed no signs of giving in to student activists’ demand that the legislative review of the controversial cross-strait service trade agreement be suspended until the oversight mechanism is institutionalized.
The bill proposed by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) was adopted at a Cabinet meeting yesterday and would allow the Legislative Yuan to revise cross-strait agreements and solicit their renegotiation.
Asked by reporters whether the bill, if enacted, would apply to the pact at the center of the Sunflower movement, MAC Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) gave only vague answers.
The movement refers to an ongoing student-led siege and occupation of the Legislative Yuan to protest the service trade agreement.
Wang said that if the oversight bill clears the legislature while the cross-strait service trade agreement is still pending review, the pact would be subject to the provisions under the bill regarding the ratification of agreements with China.
Nevertheless, Wang said: “[The bill] would not make any difference to the pact.”
The government “respects” the right of the legislature to decide whether to review the draft bill first and then the service trade agreement, or vice versa, Wang said.
“However, from my perspective, the result in each case would be the same,” he added.
Wang declined to elaborate on why the cross-strait service trade pact would be unaffected if lawmakers were given a mandate to revise agreements.
“Let’s talk about this next time,” he said.
The draft bill suggests that a cross-strait agreement would automatically go into effect if the legislature fails to complete its review within three months, which could be extended once for another three months.
Asked whether the service trade agreement would be considered already ratified if the oversight bill is passed by the legislature, given that it has been more than nine months since the agreement was sent to the legislature for review, Wang gave no answer.
Wang said he could not answer the question because the government had agreed to a resolution reached among lawmakers in June last year that the service trade agreement would not become effective without being reviewed and voted on item-by-item.
“If the legislature adopts the draft bill, we still need to figure out how much bearing the June resolution would have on a newly enacted law,” Wang said.
The bill calls for the Executive Yuan to communicate better with the Legislative Yuan and the public on cross-strait negotiations before, during and after such agreements are signed, and to establish a screening mechanism to examine how deals would affect the country from a national security perspective.
Several main points in the oversight mechanism proposed by the Democratic Front Against Cross-Strait Trade in Services Agreement — one of the groups leading the ongoing legislative siege — highlighting the role of the public and the legislature in cross-strait negotiations were not accepted by the government in its version.
These include a demand that the government present a report to the legislature detailing its plan to ink a deal with China and give the legislature 90 days to consider the plan before it decides whether to allow the government to begin negotiations.
Under the civic group’s version, the government is also required to allow civic groups to assess a proposed agreement within 180 days after completion of negotiations and prior to signing the deal, while the legislature is mandated to demand renegotiation when their conclusions differ significantly from those reached by the government.
Wang said that the government highly disapproved of the ideas because the Republic of China Constitution gives the executive branch exclusive power over trade activities with foreign countries, “not the legislative branch,” as opposed to Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution, which he said the civic groups had consulted.
“The ideas run counter to the system of the separation of power in our Constitution,” he said.
The processes the government would be required to abide by would be tantamount to asking the government to “reveal to Mainland China our bottom line,” Wang said.
“In that case, we would lose any negotiation before it begins,” he added.
If the version proposed by the civic group were to pass the legislature, it would make it impossible to sign any cross-strait agreement, Wang said.
Democratic Progressive Party spokesperson Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) said that the Executive Yuan proposal would create “a monitoring mechanism in name only,” under which the legislature would not have the required powers to effectively supervise cross-strait negotiations and agreements.
source: Taipei Times
|
