|
Former security head slams King visits
RESOLUTION REQUIRED: Ting Yu-chou said the National Security Council boss’ actions had no legal backing and the law gave him no command over other units
By Tzou Jiing-wen and Jake Chung / Staff reporter, with staff writer
The so-called “inspection visits” made by National Security Council (NSC) Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) to other intelligence units not only lack legal backing, but also infringed on jurisdictional authority of the National Security Bureau (NSB) and may cause unforeseen results for national security in the future, former bureau director Ting Yu-chou (丁渝洲) said yesterday.
On June 6, King visited the National Police Agency (NPA) to sit in on the presentation of a report, after a visit on June 4 to the Ministry of Justice’s Investigation Bureau, prompting criticism from opposition legislators, as well as some Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers, who said the act was an overreach of authority.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Thursday last week defended King, saying “how could he [King] be my chief of staff [if he had not visited the agencies]? I would have thought that he had failed in his duty had he not done so.”
Ting said Ma demonstrated a lack consideration for adversity over the past six years, adding that he placed too much emphasis on opportunities to be had, but failed to realize the possible risks involved.
“This has directly led to the chaos in our society and the strong public discontent against the government,” Ting said.
Of the three people who have headed the council in the Ma administration’s six years, only King visited other intelligence units after assuming the position, Ting said.
Ting said King’s disrespect for established systems and an inordinate amount of trust placed in only one person by Ma is a direct reason the president would be unable to foster authority in the intelligence community.
First-hand information on national matters is a necessity for the job, Ting said of Ma’s comment in support of King, adding however that the NSB’s job parameters already provided adequate information.
Article 2 of the Organization Act for the National Security Bureau (國家安全局組織法) states the parameters of the bureau’s functions, ie, the integration, leading, coordination and support of all intelligence efforts by the General Political Warfare Bureau, the Military Intelligence Bureau, the Electronic Information Development Office, the Military Safety Office, the Military Police Headquarters, the Coast Guard Administration, the NPA, the National Immigration Agency and the justice ministry’s Investigation Bureau.
The NSB provided regular and special reports, both in writing and in person, to the president, and also has in place a system to ensure the president receives the most up to date information on the nation’s status and takes appropriate countermeasures should they be called for even when he is abroad, Ting said.
“I do not know how this does not count as first-hand information,” Ting said.
Ting added that King’s actions did not have legal backing, pointing to the Organization Law of the National Security Council (國家安全會議組織法).
The act states that the council is primarily an advisory unit for the president to consult and Article 6 states that the duty of the council secretary-general is to conduct his business as per the council’s decisions and the command and oversight of his subordinates, Ting said, adding that nowhere has it mentioned that the secretary-general can assume command over units outside of the council.
The NSB is only concerned with the gathering of intelligence and should not be overseeing the actual handling of security of the nation, Ting said.
Ting said the council was tasked with helping the president make decisions, while the NSB helped gather the data needed to make those decisions.
“It has been a system where the two helped each other and not one where the jurisdictions overlap,” Ting said.
With the council intervention it seemed that the distinction between gathering of intelligence and enforcing security has been blurred, and the NSB and other intelligence agencies would be inclined to edge closer to the council, Ting said.
Ting said he did not know if the planned general surveillance over all intelligence units by the council was a keystone in the council’s development or the beginning of a bad habit, adding that there would be unforeseen consequences if it did become a habit.
The relationship between the council and other intelligence agencies is a delicate and sensitive matter that has far-ranging repercussions, Ting said, adding that Ma, as a student of law, should know the importance of obeying the law.
Ting said that his opposition was not based on support for any political party, adding that he is solely concerned for the jurisdiction of the council and the NSB.
Ting, who was appointed as the council’s secretary-general in August 2001 and served until March 2002 under then-president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration, said the controversy was a grave matter that would impact directly on the system of national security.
Saying that he hoped everyone could put aside their differences and consider the issue from the vantage point of a nation, he added that the sooner the issue is resolved, the better it will be for the nation and the intelligence and security agencies.
source: Taipei Times
|
