|
Ting Hsin media move unsavory
By Flora Chang 張錦華
Ting Hsin International Group (頂新國際集團) has got into trouble three times within a single year for failing to ensure the safety of its food products. By allowing tainted cooking oils to enter the market, the group has broken the law and betrayed the trust of its consumers. These failures have caused serious risks and have aroused the anger of officials and the general public. Some have even accused Ting Hsin of endangering people’s lives for the sake of profit.
Ting Hsin’s problems are no longer just a matter of one or two substandard products or poor management. The group’s owners and managers have been shown to lack a sense of corporate responsibility and ethics as they sacrifice consumers’ health to maximize profits. To make matters worse, Ting Hsin spokespeople’s attempts to explain these incidents do not contain a hint of the professional introspection that one would expect from a major producer.
Several county and city governments, schools and colleges have decided to boycott the companies responsible for producing tainted foods. People are refusing to buy or eat their products to drive them out of the market.
While all this is going on, it should be kept in mind that Ting Hsin is applying to acquire cable television operator China Network Systems (中嘉寬頻), which serves nearly 30 percent of cable TV customers in Taiwan. One wonders how the National Communications Commission (NCC) is going to assess this bid by the owners of a corporation so lacking in corporate responsibility and ethical conscience to step into the media sector — especially when it wants to operate a system that is big enough to influence the channel allocation and positioning of every commercial TV station.
Oils and other foodstuffs are food on the table and information is food for the mind. Furthermore, information is the bedrock of a free and democratic country. Are those who have demonstrated a lack of corporate ethics in food production fit to run companies in the media sector, where they will have a strong influence over the public’s mental sustenance?
Existing laws regarding cable television do not specifically regulate how those who bid to operate cable TV channels should be assessed for their fitness to do so. However, Article 1 of the Cable Radio and Television Act (有線廣播電視法) does list the purposes of its enactment as being “to promote the sound development of the cable radio and television industry, to safeguard the audio-visual rights and interests of the public, and to enhance social well-being.”
If an entrepreneur who applies to run a cable TV system has clearly demonstrated a lack of business ethics and blatantly infringed laws and regulations without regard for the public’s well-being or the national interest, the harm such a person could do through media operations could be even greater than that caused by tainted food products, because a society that lacks free and accurate information will probably be incapable of overseeing government and business.
The question of an operators’ fitness to run media organizations has widespread implications, so the NCC should stop using the excuse that there are no specific regulations pertaining to the issue. After all, precedents from other countries are available for reference.
In July 2007, a scandal broke out in connection with interception of police telephone calls by reporters working for well-known British newspaper the News of the World, which was owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News International and its parent, News Corp. This behavior violated reporting ethics that are commonly accepted by the British public and attracted widespread condemnation.
A British parliamentary inquiry into the affair concluded that the hacking was not the work of “a single rogue reporter,” but rather a case of “wilful blindness” by the entire media corporation, as its management chose to disregard serious breaches of journalistic ethics.
It found that the affair arose from a corporate culture and style that permeated the organization from top to bottom, and that the key role in the whole affair was played by none other than the corporation’s executive chairman — Murdoch.
It found that, following the outbreak of the scandal, Murdoch had sought to evade his responsibility and mislead parliament.
The report concluded that “Rupert Murdoch is not a fit person to exercise the stewardship of a major international company.”
Existing laws governing broadcasting and electronic media declare that the aims of the government’s oversight and management of the media are the public’s viewing and listening rights, the sound development of the industry and social well-being. The NCC should do a proper job of pursuing these aims to prevent the government’s competence from being repeatedly cast into doubt.
Furthermore, future legal amendments should include “fitness” as one of the criteria to be considered when assessing those that apply to operate major media outlets. Prospective operators that lack corporate social responsibility and a moral conscience and those deemed incapable of taking on the responsibilities that media organizations should bear in a free and democratic society should be subject to a more open process of public hearings to judge whether they are fit to run media operations.
Flora Chang is a professor at National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of Journalism.
Translated by Julian Clegg
source: Taipei Times
|
