|
US moots ‘guerrilla’ defense strategy
MINI SUBS: A Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments report said the nation would be better served buying miniature submarines rather than diesel-electric subs
By William Lowther / Staff reporter in WASHINGTON
Taiwan should change its defense strategy and concentrate on “guerrilla” warfare according to a lengthy new report from a Washington-based policy research institute.
“Despite the gravity of Taiwan’s situation, it would be premature to consider its defense a lost cause,” the report said.
Prepared by the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA), the report said that with Taipei confronted by a Beijing regime that places a growing emphasis on its ability to quickly win small, local wars, “time has emerged as Taiwan’s single-most precious strategic commodity.”
Acquiring and maintaining the ability to protract any conflict with China “should therefore be at the very heart of Taiwan’s defense strategy” the report said.
In the event of war, the principal aim should be to impede the ability of China’s People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) to control the airspace and seas around the nation using guerrilla tactics.
“If the PLA were to initiate a war, it would likely set air supremacy and naval mastery as top objectives in order to facilitate subsequent attacks on, or a blockade of, Taiwan, break Taiwan’s political will, or set conditions for a subsequent invasion,” the report said.
According to the report, as long as the nation retains, or appears to retain, the ability to destroy a significant fraction of the amphibious shipping and transport aircraft required for a successful invasion, it would reduce the probability of such an invasion ever being launched.
Taiwan should therefore adopt a sea denial strategy that is complemented and protected by an unconventional air defense campaign along the lines of North Vietnam’s use of air defenses in its war with the US.
“Doing so would buy critical time in which outside powers could intervene and raise the specter of a protracted war, which may in and of itself serve as a deterrent to PRC [People’s Republic of China] aggression,” the report said.
The report was written by former US deputy assistant secretary of defense Jim Thomas, retired US Air Force officer John Stillion and CSBA research fellow Iskander Rehman.
Taiwan does not need to exert absolute control over its surrounding waters to succeed, the authors said.
“It must simply be able to identify and successfully attack a significant portion of any approaching blockade or invasion fleet,” the report said.
To this end, Taipei should build a fleet of about 42 midget submarines similar to those used by North Korea and Iran.
These midget submarines — with a displacement of 120 tonnes — would be more easily produced indigenously and are a fraction of the cost of the large diesel-electric vessels now being planned.
As the midget subs harass the invasion fleet — most likely consisting of 32 amphibious transport ships and 60 naval combatant escorts — Taiwan would also need about 1,200 anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCM).
“These could be stored in road-mobile, four-pack launchers with the same external appearance as trucks ferrying standard 20-foot shipping containers,” the report said.
At the same time, Taipei needs to place heavy emphasis on mining.
The report said pre-positioning small, lethal unmanned underwater vehicles and smart mines in the Taiwan Strait or near Chinese ports would complicate Beijing’s offensive plans to achieve command of the strait and blockade the nation’s ports.
Together, 42 midget submarines, 1,200 ASCM and launchers, and a large inventory of mines would cost about US$1.5 billion, less than the planned eight diesel-electric subs, “while providing greater sea denial capability.”
Rather than spending billions of US dollars to recapitalize its inventory of fighter aircraft, the nation should build a highly distributed and resilient network of ground-based air defense systems.
“The main objective behind Taiwan’s air defense effort should not be to destroy every intruding PLA aircraft, but rather to impose real and virtual attrition, while surviving to operate for as long as possible,” the report said.
If China succeeded in establishing a beachhead, the Taiwanese army could “melt into the island’s urban and mountainous areas in order to wage a war of a thousand cuts against PLA occupation forces,” the report said.
source: Taipei Times
|
